Kobe University, A recent study from Kobe University has found that casual blood glucose testing fails to identify approximately 70% of gestational diabetes cases in pregnant women. The findings highlight the need for obstetricians to rely on more accurate screening methods to prevent complications during pregnancy and reduce the risk of type II diabetes for both mothers and their children.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) occurs when previously healthy women experience elevated blood sugar levels during pregnancy. While most women can deliver healthy babies with proper treatment, unmanaged GDM can lead to serious complications, including larger-than-average babies and an increased risk of developing type II diabetes later in life for both the mother and child. In response, the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommends that all women without a prior diabetes diagnosis undergo an oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy.
This comprehensive test involves fasting for 8-12 hours before taking a baseline blood sample, followed by the consumption of a glucose solution. After a designated period, a second blood sample is taken to assess how well the body processes sugar. However, many healthcare facilities opt for a simpler and quicker “casual” blood glucose test, which measures blood sugar levels at any time without considering the patient’s recent food intake. Women who test positive in this initial screening are then referred for the more detailed glucose tolerance test.
Concerned about the potential for missed diagnoses with this two-tiered approach, Dr. Kenji Tanimura and graduate student Masako Tomimoto from Kobe University Hospital conducted a study combining both screening methods. They implemented a protocol where all women visiting their perinatal center underwent both the casual blood glucose screening and the more sensitive glucose challenge test. Women who tested positive in the glucose challenge test were then asked to complete the glucose tolerance test, allowing the researchers to determine how many cases would have been overlooked if only the casual test had been used.
Published in the Journal of Diabetes Investigation, the study revealed that among the 99 women ultimately diagnosed with gestational diabetes, 71.7% had initial blood sugar levels that would have resulted in a negative diagnosis if solely relying on the casual test. “While previous studies have indicated that casual blood glucose tests are less sensitive, our research directly compared results within the same individuals, confirming that this widely used method frequently fails to detect the condition it is designed to identify,” Tomimoto explained.
To further investigate the prevalence of this issue, the research team surveyed healthcare facilities in Hyogo Prefecture, where Kobe University is located. They found that 43% of respondents using blood glucose tests relied exclusively on casual screenings. “In Japan, where approximately half of all deliveries occur in obstetric clinics rather than hospitals, the more accurate but complex tests are not widely implemented,” Tomimoto noted. This issue is not confined to Japan; similar surveys in the UK indicated that 48% of clinics also rely solely on casual blood glucose tests for initial screenings.
Dr. Tanimura emphasized the implications of their findings, stating, “We aim to educate healthcare professionals and patients about the risks associated with this screening method and advocate for the adoption of the more accurate glucose tolerance test. Our goal is to enhance the management of gestational diabetes and revise screening guidelines, ultimately protecting more mothers and babies from complications and reducing the future risk of diabetes.”
Related Topics:
